Hi,

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:14:37 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 13/12/2015 09:08, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > +    pvs_k->parent_dc_realize = dc->realize;
> 
> Marcel, Michael,
> 
> this creates a really nasty dependency on the contents of pci_qdev_realize.
> 
> Can you instead change PCIDeviceClass's pc->is_express to a function
> pointer, and provide a sample implementation pci_is_express_true for the
> devices that set is_express to true?

Thanks Paolo, I like the idea.
Indeed repeating the parent_dc_realize hack for various devices seems
awkward.

If this approach is accepted, I'm okay doing the suggested refactor.

Regards,
Shmulik

Reply via email to