On 11/12/15 14:47, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Huth, on Fri 11 Dec 2015 14:43:42 +0100, wrote: >> Anyway, it's IMHO a somewhat strange way to structure a patch ... maybe >> it would be nicer to do it in one go instead (after splitting off the >> arp_requested renaming)? > > Please discuss about it with the people who asked for it. I won't > revamp patches until what people prefer is settled.
It's maybe best if Jan Kiszka could comment on such question since he's the slirp subsystem maintainer and finally has to decide whether to take the patches or not. Thomas
