On 12/02/2015 03:46 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Instead of allocating a new struct just for PcGuestInfo and the
mchine_done Notifier, place them inside PCMachineState.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/pc.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
include/hw/i386/pc.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index f32000a..30cdfaf 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -1155,18 +1155,12 @@ typedef struct PcRomPciInfo {
uint64_t w64_max;
} PcRomPciInfo;
-typedef struct PcGuestInfoState {
- PcGuestInfo info;
- Notifier machine_done;
-} PcGuestInfoState;
-
static
-void pc_guest_info_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
+void pc_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
{
- PcGuestInfoState *guest_info_state = container_of(notifier,
- PcGuestInfoState,
- machine_done);
- PCIBus *bus = PC_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine())->bus;
+ PCMachineState *pcms = container_of(notifier,
+ PCMachineState, machine_done);
+ PCIBus *bus = pcms->bus;
if (bus) {
int extra_hosts = 0;
@@ -1177,21 +1171,20 @@ void pc_guest_info_machine_done(Notifier *notifier,
void *data)
extra_hosts++;
}
}
- if (extra_hosts && guest_info_state->info.fw_cfg) {
+ if (extra_hosts && pcms->acpi_guest_info.fw_cfg) {
uint64_t *val = g_malloc(sizeof(*val));
*val = cpu_to_le64(extra_hosts);
- fw_cfg_add_file(guest_info_state->info.fw_cfg,
+ fw_cfg_add_file(pcms->acpi_guest_info.fw_cfg,
"etc/extra-pci-roots", val, sizeof(*val));
}
}
- acpi_setup(&guest_info_state->info);
+ acpi_setup(&pcms->acpi_guest_info);
}
PcGuestInfo *pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
{
- PcGuestInfoState *guest_info_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *guest_info_state);
- PcGuestInfo *guest_info = &guest_info_state->info;
+ PcGuestInfo *guest_info = &pcms->acpi_guest_info;
int i, j;
guest_info->ram_size_below_4g = pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
@@ -1219,8 +1212,8 @@ PcGuestInfo *pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
}
}
- guest_info_state->machine_done.notify = pc_guest_info_machine_done;
- qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&guest_info_state->machine_done);
+ pcms->machine_done.notify = pc_machine_done;
+ qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&pcms->machine_done);
return guest_info;
}
diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
index a74bded..61aa6ee 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ struct PCMachineState {
OnOffAuto smm;
ram_addr_t below_4g_mem_size, above_4g_mem_size;
PCIBus *bus;
+ PcGuestInfo acpi_guest_info;
+ Notifier machine_done;
Hi,
Arm's virt machine also has a machine_done notifier
and a PcGuestInfo like structure (for building the ACPI).
Maybe it worth checking moving machine_done up to Machine
and investigate also the same possibility for a common
acpi guest info ancestor. For the moment all they have in
common is fw_config.
If anybody is looking for an adventure we can make a common
base class for ARM virt and PC machine, something like
ACPI_MACHINE. :)
Just a thought anyway,
Thanks,
Marcel
};
#define PC_MACHINE_ACPI_DEVICE_PROP "acpi-device"