Hi Max:
在 2015/12/5 5:21, Max Reitz 写道:
On 03.12.2015 11:01, Bo Tu wrote:
From: Bo Tu <t...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The tests for ide device should only be tested for the pc
platform.
Set device_id to "drive0", and replace every "-drive file..."
by "-drive file=...,if=none,id=$device_id", then x86 and s390x
can get the common output in the test of "Snapshot mode".
Warning message expected for s390x when drive without device.
A x86 platform specific output file is also needed.
Reviewed-by: Sascha Silbe <si...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bo Tu <t...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/051 | 95 ++++++----
tests/qemu-iotests/051.out | 163 ++++------------
tests/qemu-iotests/051.pc.out | 422 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/051.pc.out
I like the overall design now, but I think we can do more still.
As evidenced by changes in the reference output from "ide0-hd0" to
"virtio0", there are still more places which are missing an explicit if
(like if=none) and id in 051 and are thus currently subject to whatever
the target platform uses as the default (which happens to be
virtio/virtio0 for s390). I think all of the places in 051 which do not
specify an interface and ID should do so (i.e. if=none,id=drive0).
Next, there are the warnings regarding orphaned drives. I'm only just
now asking myself the question where they really come from, and I guess
it's mostly the fact that we are trying to use if=ide, if=floppy and
if=scsi which do not seem to be supported by s390. I guess we should
simply not do any of the tests which use any of these interfaces (or,
phrased differently, only do tests which use if=none or if=virtio).
I'd be willing to merge this patch now anyway, though, as long as there
will be a follow-up patch addressing these issues, if you agree.
I will create a follow-up patch to address these issues you mentioned.
thanks a lot for your review!! Have a good weekend.
Max
