Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:

> On 12/02/2015 04:51 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> This is the fixup I mentioned in the v13 thread.  The "Unreachable and
>> not implemented" hunk should probably be its own patch.
>
> In fact, that hunk...
>
>> 
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi.py b/scripts/qapi.py
>> index 6d38d7c..870e476 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi.py
>
>> @@ -1073,7 +1071,8 @@ class QAPISchemaMember(object):
>>                  return '(parameter of %s)' % owner[:-4]
>>              else:
>>                  assert owner.endswith('-wrapper')
>> -                return '(branch of %s)' % owner[:-8]
>> +                # Unreachable and not implemented
>> +                assert False
>>          if owner.endswith('Kind'):
>>              # See QAPISchema._make_implicit_enum_type()
>>              return '(branch of %s)' % owner[:-4]
>
> ...should probably just be squashed directly into commit 8f3a05b on your
> current qapi-next branch, since it hasn't landed upstream yet.

Good idea.

> Your fixup looks sane, and eliminates the need for 12/15.  So I'm fine

Yes, let's set that patch aside for now.  We can bring it back if we
find a need.

> if you'd like to make that change when updating qapi-next.
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>

Checkout out your later fixups now.

Reply via email to