On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:15:01PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 18.11.15 11:49, David Gibson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:45:39PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> On 11/09/2015 07:47 PM, David Gibson wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:47:17PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >>>> Section B.6.2.1 Root Node Properties of PAPR specification defines > >>>> a set of properties which shall be present in the device tree root, > >>>> one of these properties is "system-id" which "should be unique across > >>>> all systems and all manufacturers". Since UUID is meant to be unique, > >>>> it makes sense to use it as "system-id". > >>>> > >>>> This adds "system-id" property to the device tree root when not empty. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> This might be expected by AIX so here is the patch. > >>>> I am really not sure if it makes sense to initialize property when > >>>> UUID is all zeroes as the requirement is "unique" and zero-uuid is > >>>> not. > >>> > >>> Yeah, I think it would be better to omit system-id entirely when a > >>> UUID hasn't been supplied. > >> > >> > >> so this did not go anywhere yet, did it? > > > > No. > > So where is it stuck?
I was waiting for a respin which didn't set the property when a UUID
hadn't been given.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
