On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:25:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 18/11/2015 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This depends on the devfn_min thing, right? > > I'm yet to review it, generally I'd prefer to > > avoid changing device allocation rules since > > that makes it so easy to break compatibility. > > > > Assuming addresses are all explicitly stated, > > is there even a problem? > > It makes it a bit easier to use pci-bridge; it is a bug, albeit one that > only affects direct usage through the command line of PCI bridges. > > Paolo
Yes but not a regression ... I'll look at how invasive the change it depends on is.
