On 17/11/2015 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote: > That doesn't seem like more than half-good news to me. In particular, > if ubsan is still diagnosing these cases and they're still a > problem in some constant expressions
Constant expressions are standardese for e.g. static int x = 1 << 31; It doesn't mean _all_ constants, and the warning only triggers with -pedantic. Regarding ubsan, give them some time to answer. :) Paolo > If the GCC folks don't want to go any further than that then > I think we should prefer to avoid this UB. (And there's still > the question of clang's position on this.)
