Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > On 11/06/2015 08:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> qapi-code-gen.txt already claims that types, commands, and >>> events share a common namespace; set this in stone by further >>> documenting that our introspection output will never have >>> collisions with the same name tied to more than one meta-type. >>> > >>> For these reasons, we simply document that clients should not >>> rely on any particular order of items in introspection output. >>> And since it is now a documented part of the contract, we have >>> the freedom to later rearrange output if needed, without >>> worrying about breaking well-written clients that were already >>> aware that they had to do linear searches. >> >> Well, any kind of search that doesn't rely on sorting. Suggest to drop >> the "that were already..." clause. Happy to do that on commit. > > I don't see that phrase dropped in your v1 pull request. Worth fixing?
Fixed in PULL v2, thanks!
