On 05/25/2010 09:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/25/2010 12:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I see it as the equivalent to the Taint bit in Linux. I want to make
it clear to users up front that if you use this option, and you have
data loss issues, don't complain.
Just putting something in qemu-doc.texi is not enough IMHO. Few
people actually read it.
So what exactly is the conclusion here? I really want to see this
getting merged.
Make it more scary and try again.
How about ./configure --with-cache-volatile to enable it at all?
We wants it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
