Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 17:35:53 +0200 > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: >> > On 05/25/2010 09:21 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> >> +MIGRATION_CANCELED >> >> +------------------ >> >> + >> >> +Emitted when migration is canceled. This is emitted in the source. >> >> +Target will emit MIGRATION_FAILED (no way to differentiate a FAILED >> >> +and CANCELED migration for target). >> >> >> > >> > But the management tool is the one that cancels so surely, it knows >> > why already. >> >> ok, then that one is ok. > > Isn't this one important for the destination instead?
Destination don't know what happened, only that conection/data is not coming anymore. >From management prespective, management application knows that it has canceled the migration, so no need to be told. Later, Juan.
