On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:26:27PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 October 2015 at 21:43, Alexander Gordeev <agord...@redhat.com> wrote: > > PCIe device tree unit name is pcie@10000000 - which denotes > > IO space base address. However, the corresponding node's > > "reg" property points to PCI configuration space base address > > 0x3f000000. > > > > Set the unit name to pcie@3f000000 which is not only correct, > > but also conforms to Open Firmware (IEEE 1275). > > Nothing should actually care about the address in the > nodename, though, right -- it's just for human readability > and debugging (and guests will be looking at the regs > etc properties of the node to figure out where it is)? > Or have I misunderstood this and there's an actual visible > consequence to this bug?
I do not think there are actual consequences out there. It is just misleading and does not honour the standard. > thanks > -- PMM -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agord...@redhat.com
