"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:

>> Once here, do we care about calling malloc with the rcu set?  or could
>> we just call malloc at the beggining of the function and free it in case
>> that it is not needed on err?
>
> Why would that be better?

We would make the rcu region smaller, not sure we should care, so
forget.

Later, Juan.

Reply via email to