On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 18 October 2015 at 17:25, Peter Crosthwaite > <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ping! >> >> Although a little featurish and RFCish, this does repair the boot of >> two ARM machines so it is very much a bugfix and we should consider >> for 2.5. Otherwise we go to release (again) with two broken machines. > > The general idea looks ok to me, but sending a patchset out labelled > RFC when we hit softfreeze is a pretty good way to cause people to > ignore it :-) > > Patch 1 looks OK I think; haven't looked too closely at the others. > > How are you picking the firmware blob addresses ? >
It is flexible as far as arm/boot.c is concerned and set as board specific policy. A board could chose to place it at an arbitrary address to mimic a real bootrom which might be desirable. For both Highbank and Zynq I put FW @0 and relocated the QEMU bootloader to a small non-zero. Regards, Peter > thanks > -- PMM
