From: Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com>
The first argument of g_free_rcu() is a pointer to a structure. But
foo_reclaim is used as a function name in the previous example along
with &foo as a pointer to the structure being reclaimed. Make the
example consistent with the previous one.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1444837604-13712-1-git-send-email-serge.f...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
docs/rcu.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/rcu.txt b/docs/rcu.txt
index 21ecb81..2f70954 100644
--- a/docs/rcu.txt
+++ b/docs/rcu.txt
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ The core RCU API is small:
the callback function is g_free, in particular, g_free_rcu can be
used. In the above case, one could have written simply:
- g_free_rcu(foo_reclaim, rcu);
+ g_free_rcu(&foo, rcu);
typeof(*p) atomic_rcu_read(p);
--
2.5.0
