On Thu, 20 May 2010 10:54:42 -0500 Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 10:35 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> I meant that we're just accepting some invalid JSON and that's not a big > >> deal. > >> > > It can become a big deal if clients rely on it and for some reason we > > decide we should drop it. Ie. after QMP is declared stable such changes > > won't be allowed. > > > > Clients should only rely on standard JSON. Anything else is a bug in > the client. I feel this is like a trap, why exposing it if don't want clients to use them?
