24.09.2015 19:18, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Michael, could you take this one through trivial? Assuming Scott and > Jiri don't mind, and with s/patchas/patch as/ in the commit message. > > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > >> g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer, >> for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t. >> Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch >> more type errors.
Applied to -trivial, thanks! /mjt
