On 09/28/2015 04:57 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Instead of using a new type for default model (82540em), using an >> alias for this to avoid bit duplication. > Suggest to rephrase as > > Instead of duplicating the "e1000-82540em" device model as "e1000", > make the latter an alias for the former.
Fix like this and apply the patch in my tree. > >> Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> Thanks.
