-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 25/09/2015 13:33, David Gibson wrote: > 1) Is there a case where using the no-replay functions makes > sense? > > I'm not sure. I think vfio is the only user so far, so I guess > that's technically a no. I was reluctant to change the interface > and semantics just off the bat, though. Considering memory_region_listener does the reply, I think it's okay. For solving the problem that Laurent mentioned, using int128 seems like the easiest solution... Paolo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWBTg7AAoJEL/70l94x66De7AIAIBdzM9tzuZzlMYKG0505+a+ E3K+CrWG0EwN1yzCWU/g4Au17BrSKQ7dVaxeemw48txHtlxxRaTU/WpV0ZGZLS2H upk3hdgbbgMR7IDgpPHx0MPXDD3nW3h2Xnom5jDr0UF/xpcnVRe+osvs5R3AS8GI bbbm/QZ3qkIUBUz7w97/d8wYCkZarsB8LoVYoy1nBLvr0QBsL+V0AGV1aw9DpgDk BtagDntAZQK1doYDVyThK6Ht4agVRF0FEUKR1fej27CriwJJnCOK5zVBP6S9gIZZ FycmNat1OT573ATlqkjXK6zHsWSvmoM0gdE4Fq3+k/qme3Waz9/v++EEBgqNHXU= =k/Kg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
