On Thu 17 Sep 2015 03:48:04 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote: > bdrv_swap() has always been an ugly hack that we would rather have > avoided. When it was introduced, we simply didn't have the > infrastructure to update pointers instead of transplanting the > contents of BDS object, so we grudgingly added bdrv_swap() as a quick > solution. Meanwhile, most of the infrastructure exists and this > series implements the final step necessary to implement the required > functionality in a less adventurous way.
I managed to crash QEMU with this series. I don't think it's a problem it the series itself, but rather some older bug that is triggered by your patches. I think I found the cause and I have a preliminary patch, I'll try to send it tomorrow. Berto
