On 09/23/2015 09:57 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:14:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
> [...]
>>> -static void net_vhost_link_down(VhostUserState *s, bool link_down)
>>> +static void net_vhost_link_down(int queues, NetClientState *ncs[],
>>> + bool link_down)
>>> {
>>> - s->nc.link_down = link_down;
>>> + NetClientState *nc;
>>> + int i;
>>>
>>> - if (s->nc.peer) {
>>> - s->nc.peer->link_down = link_down;
>>> - }
>>> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>>> + nc = ncs[i];
>>>
>>> - if (s->nc.info->link_status_changed) {
>>> - s->nc.info->link_status_changed(&s->nc);
>>> - }
>>> + nc->link_down = link_down;
>>> +
>>> + if (nc->peer) {
>>> + nc->peer->link_down = link_down;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (nc->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> + nc->info->link_status_changed(nc);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - if (s->nc.peer && s->nc.peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> - s->nc.peer->info->link_status_changed(s->nc.peer);
>>> + if (nc->peer && nc->peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> + nc->peer->info->link_status_changed(nc->peer);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> }
>> The semantics is a little bit difference with qmp_set_link. What's the
>> reason for this? If there's no specific reason, probably, we could just
>> reuse qmp_set_link() (or part of) here?
> I did this just because I refactored the vhost_user init code, making
> the char dev handler to initiate all ncs. Hence I turned net_vhost_link_down()
> to handle all ncs, just like what I did for vhost_user_start().
>
> And TBH, I'm not aware of qmp_set_link() before, and after reading the
> code, I do think we can simply invoke it instead. And thanks for the
> info.
>
>> Other looks good to me.
> Thanks for the review. May I add your reviewed-by if I fix above issue?
>
> --yliu
I prefer to add it myself :)
Thanks.
