On 22 September 2015 at 07:58, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Paolo asked for an update.
>>
>> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:
>> Different tack: what are the unmaintained files we actually change?
>>
>> Unmaintained files sorted by number of commits in the past year (commit
>> 1733681):
>>
>>     $ for i in `cat unmaintained-files`; do echo -n "$i "; git-rev-list 
>> 1733681.. $i | wc -l; done | awk '{ printf "%7d %s\n", $2, $1 }' | sort -rn 
>> | head -n 100
>>          79 trace-events
>
> We should probably just kill the trace-events file from git entirely.
> Everyone more or less appends to it, which guarantees each patch
> series conflicts on it, and no one person is suitable as maintainer
> of it really.

Strong agreement; a single trace-events file is just nasty.

-- PMM

Reply via email to