-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 15/09/2015 02:30, David Gibson wrote: >>> I think the comment is wrong or at least inaccurate; it only >>> applies to the external QOM interface. The patch is a good >>> idea, even though OBJECT(x)->y traditionally is not used >>> (instead you assign OBJECT(x) to a different Object* >>> variable). > Ok.. so are you prepared to give a Reviewed-by, or do I need to > ask someone else (Andreas?) to approve this as QOMishly correct? I am, but as I said in another message I wonder if accessing the parent field is actually necessary. Paolo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV9/toAAoJEL/70l94x66DlgIH/3gVH53/bBLzUc77IfDbGlMZ FIA94/uVb+HJWz29y0yv3V9RO+PpjhO9rQWUM3K+1TyH+Bu0st9HlGcxjhZVXpsH So0IcVgBGFZry+3XyuIZ9TanpDcKo1cXSc5OZ/P7eBP/TviLcKshtfmn9WpgRWm7 DnVBFe1rSId7a8qn8BUeHyHtCLEwWcn8sOJla4w66PiGXVBG1p+mMU+lOXm6mQMD sy3LNMRS2duhDyMncMF6tsTn03CesfiW+2b1U5U/Q3ZIFTLdOLFMTiBK8giTfd2J FoePn1sZkF5SW4fPL8Gye1qbmnkpLUDMODHTUF3AI61Q11CAULFjxOkPK/QGEEI= =lh5f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
