On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:27:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 09/07/2015 04:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:39:59 +0800 > > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> > On 09/02/2015 07:06 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:25:21 +0800 > >>> > > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>>> > >> +static int get_extra_state(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size) > >>>> > >> +{ > >>>> > >> + VirtIODevice *vdev = pv; > >>>> > >> + BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev)); > >>>> > >> + VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus); > >>>> > >> + int ret = 0; > >>>> > >> + > >>>> > >> + ret = k->load_extra_state(qbus->parent, f); > >>> > > Should we check for ->load_extra_state() and return failure if it does > >>> > > not exist? > >> > > >> > I think checking the existence of has_extra_state() in > >> > virtio_extra_state_needed() is enough for this? Or is there anything I > >> > miss? > > The has_extra_state() callback is called by the sender, not by the > > receiver. > > > > If the other side sent the extra state but we can't handle it, I think > > it would be better to fail the migration than to crash. Still broken > > code, but probably easier to debug :) > > > > I see so it only happen when transport provides save_extra_state() but > not get_extra_sate(). I'm ok to add the check in next version . > > Thanks
This seems minor enough. I think I'll merge this as is, we can tweak things using patches on top.