-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 09/09/2015 09:29, Thomas Huth wrote: >> Doesn't help for existing guests. Basically what I'm trying to >> achieve is for qemu to reject up-front configurations that are >> unlikely to actually work in the guest. > > I just wonder whether it makes sense to change the guest instead. I agree; perhaps it's a one-liner. The patch is simple, but I wonder if it is really a case of "if it hurts, don't do it". Paolo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV8CGFAAoJEL/70l94x66DhAYH/jlUe5xCT6YS5uiYQukrPrVC rjJAzqLUUdKh62GHR62wKkylVds9YtFYlkLGLbaXUDO0uVlgvyr4BrPZ8xeKcfPg 3yMtoFIZr3rLdsY1Bbjk/ReyY5uU9fRvU8WHCSXeCsWqMUmFpMm7HdnbCdh+3mCW bNUUuBorxCQMI+2ra8FNLCc/wMmw4M4M0uUtcGYOwxUkfcjPbQyqWFOtbj3Q2Mo9 CrGjW8u48ZFgiPMtHPI+hetZQBrMltoqokCl0Ca2DuWRK8pmSERDS7NqlNfzWDiL /dyKkznPuWB4jox/NyeMpXmPMSgrwcSg3YvBv8My3EOiIcPp8b+nGCTLCkmbjzw= =3vF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
