On Mon 07 Sep 2015 04:55:47 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Of course, this means that we need to provide a way to actually > fulfill the right conditions, and you might be right that it doesn't > exist yet. Could the same effect as BDRV_O_NO_BACKING possibly be > achieved with blockdev-add with something like '"backing": {}'?
I'm not sure it that would be the best API, but the overall idea looks good to me. Berto