Am 03.09.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Markus Armbruster: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes: >> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:18:28PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> I had suggested exactly this looong time ago, but Anthony opposed it. I >>> don't quite remember why... >> >> It is a while back now so I don't remember all aspects of the discussion >> either. The main thing I remember is that we could not simply use the >> existing GObject model from glib, since that exclusively records properties >> against the object class. In some cases, particularly the relationships >> between objects, QEMU needed to be able to define properties on the fly >> against object instances. > > I remember Anthony's assertion that this is the case, but I don't > remember the actual problems where this is actually the case. > > What properties do we currently define that could not be defined against > the class?
All child<> properties and everything on Container objects. Cheers, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
