Blue Swirl wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I finally refreshed some of my monitor patches. PCI and HPET patches
> (attached, they don't apply anymore) need more work because of the new
> monitor design.
> 
> The patches provide a method for devices to register new monitor
> commands. This fixes some design problems, like useless
> pic_info/irq_info functions for most architectures.
> 
> I think automation via qdev field was requested the last time. I added
> something like this, though it doesn't fit the cases where several
> functions need to be registered.
> 
> Comments?

I'll soon send out a series that adds "device_show <qdev-path>" to
visualize the full state, something that will at least obsolete "info
pic" and "info hpet" sooner or later, maybe even more. Also, I would
like to qdev'ify CPUs in order to make them reachable for device_show
(which evaluates qdev->info.vmstate).

I'm not sure: How many use cases for a "dev_info" would remain?
Moreover, to dump statistics, we should rather add some "device_stats
<qdev-path>" command instead of mixing both usages under an info command.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to