On 25 August 2015 at 18:39, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer, > for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t. > Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch > more type errors. > > This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form > sizeof(T).
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
