On 08/21/2015 06:11 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 21/08/15 20:04, John Snow wrote: > > (lots cut) > >> Do you want to resend the V3 here directly to the ML with Aurelien >> Jarno's R-B? > > I was actually looking at this yesterday, and it seems with some more > testing that only the DBDMA flush part is required. It could be that > fixing the flush semantics prevents the macio device getting into the > incorrect state that makes the macio patch necessary in the first place. > > In this case the DBDMA patch should probably go via Alex since it's > fairly specific to the Mac DMA hardware rather than being related just > to the IDE interface. > > > ATB, > > Mark. >
Even better! 8-) Thanks, --js
