On 2015年08月14日 16:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 August 2015 at 04:25, gchen gchen <xili_gchen_5...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> - If the performance of "linux-user + softmmu + tci" is not acceptable
>> (at present, I am not quite sure), we have to implement SW64 tcg host
>> target instead of tci.
>
> If you care even slightly about performance, then do not use TCI.
> A tcg backend is only about 2000 lines of code, they're not terribly
> difficult to implement.
>
OK, thank you for your suggestion, but for me, I guess, I still need let
tci work correctly:
- If I implement SW64 tcg backend, I guess, I cann't get help from qemu
upstream: I don't think SW64 is valuable enough for upstream (either
I am not sure that I can implment Alpha tcg backend in working time).
- tci is one tcg backend, at present, it can let i386 console programs
work under Alpha. So I can learn tcg backend by fixing its X issues
with the help from upstream (then implement SW64 tcg backend, next).
- Also tci is only slightly lower than tcg native backend, so if we are
lucky, its performance may be enough too! (I hope so).
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
