On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:42:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:30:37AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:00:35PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> >On 08/11/2015 07:11 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>On 10 August 2015 at 08:13, Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >>>The header file was introduced by following Linux upstream commits:
>> >>>
>> >>> commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
>> >>> commit ec33d36 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_pe_inject_err()")
>> >>>
>> >>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >>>---
>> >>> linux-headers/asm-powerpc/eeh.h | 56
>> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>> >>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-powerpc/eeh.h
>> >>
>> >>Shouldn't this be added by updating scripts/update-linux-headers.sh
>> >>and then doing a plain "synchronize headers against kernel version $X" ?
>> >
>> >
>> >I also thought this is the protocol but then I looked into the git history
>> >and discovered this is not always the case :)
>> >
>> >
>>
>> So should I use scripts/update-linux-headers.sh or what I had is
>> fine?
>
>Please use update-linux-headers.sh - and make sure you also update the
>script itself (if necessary) so it will pull in future updates to
>eeh.h
>
Sure, thanks, David. It will be covered in next revision.
Thanks,
Gavin
