From: Lu Lina <lina.lul...@huawei.com>
vhost_virtqueue_mask takes an "absolute" virtqueue index, while the
code looks like it's passing an index that is relative to
s->dev.vq_index. In reality, s->dev.vq_index is always zero, so
this patch does not make any difference, but the code is clearer.
Signed-off-by: Lu Lina <lina.lul...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <1437978359-17960-1-git-send-email-arei.gong...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
index 0dd57ff..7eacca9 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_start(VHostSCSI *s)
* enabling/disabling irqfd.
*/
for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; i++) {
- vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, i, false);
+ vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, s->dev.vq_index + i, false);
}
return ret;
--
2.4.3
