Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> writes: > On 08/04/2015 08:15 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 4 August 2015 at 16:11, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> writes: >>>> On 2015-08-03 10:14, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> In practice this is not true for linked TB. Should we also disable TB >>>> linking when this option is enabled? >>> >>> Good question. I suspect yes because if you've gone to level of wanting >>> exec tracing you'll probably get confused by the chaining. Of course it >>> will run a lot slower then. >> >> Unless the bug you were trying to track down is caused by the exec >> chaining, of course... But yes, I think we get more people wanting >> chaining to be disableable. >> >> Not sure we want to tie it to the 'cpu' debug option, though -- it >> applies just as much to 'exec'. > > Does it make more sense to have a 'nochain' debug option, and not tie it to > either 'cpu' or 'exec'? It might be occasionally useful on its own, simply to > determine if a bug does exist in the exec chaining.
Would that make sense as a debug option or should we have a specific set of TCG options to alter its behaviour? > > > r~ -- Alex Bennée
