On 28/07/2015 12:58, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> What's defining all these macros? >> >> They're in asm/unistd.h. >> >> I think that, instead of making qemu/osdep.h the new qemu-common.h, the >> wrappers added by patch 3 should be declared in a new header >> qemu/memfd.h. The implementation in util/memfd.c can include both >> linux/fcntl.h and asm/unistd.h. >> > > Ok, shouldn't it keep the inline function? this avoids future clash > when upgrading glibc.
Can the inline function stay in util/memfd.c? Paolo
