On 07/24/15 20:16, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > An SMI should definitely wake up a processor in halted state! > This lets OVMF boot with SMM on multiprocessor systems, although > it halts very soon after that with a "CpuIndex != BspIndex" > assertion failure. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaer...@suse.de> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> > Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > --- > target-i386/cpu.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c > index 7a779b1..ee7b4ac 100644 > --- a/target-i386/cpu.c > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c > @@ -3134,6 +3134,7 @@ static bool x86_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs) > return ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) && > (env->eflags & IF_MASK)) || > (cs->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI | > + CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI | > CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT | > CPU_INTERRUPT_SIPI | > CPU_INTERRUPT_MCE)) || >
My bad, please disregard this one patch in the series -- an improved version has already been committed as a9bad65d2c1f61af74ce2ff43238d4b20bf81c3a. Sorry about the noise (but please do pick up the first two patches). Thanks! Laszlo
