Hi Marc-André,

Am 09.07.2015 um 16:37 schrieb Marc-André Lureau:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Also, see the discussion on my RFC: CONFIG_LINUX is wrong here. It would
>>> need to depend on KVM/eventfd, and for that there is no easy config
>>> option available here, which stopped my patch at the time.
>>
>>
>> Right, I don't have good answer for that. I'd need more help.
> 
> Actually, ivshmem doesn't use ioeventfd by default. And my tests do
> not enable it either.
> 
> So the test runs fine with kvm disabled on my host. Is that enough then?
> 
> I couldn't find the discussion on "RFC: CONFIG_LINUX", do you have a pointer?

Pretty sure I pointed you to my RFC already:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/336367/

Paolo wrote: "I think ivshmem depends on ioeventfd"
And mst suggested: "maybe it's easier to implement eventfd APIs"
Which I didn't do, and am not aware anyone else did, but maybe I missed it?

I've dug out my old patch with the tempfile name fix but didn't get to
implementing that missing query while dealing with the qom-cpu pull.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to