On 06/26/2015 06:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/06/2015 18:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>>>> + if (kvm_irqfds_enabled() && kvm_resamplefds_enabled() &&
>>>> + vdev->irqfd_allowed) {
>>>> + sbc->connect_irq_notifier = vfio_start_irqfd_injection;
>> Should we be abstracting this to a
>> sysbus_register_connect_irq_notifier()? It seems a littler personal to
>> be reaching in and setting it ourselves and would avoid us needing to
>> reference the class.
>
> It's your class, so it's not too bad to touch it from that point of
> view; on the other hand it's ugly to do it here nevertheless. :)
>
> I think you should always set "sbc->connect_irq_notifier =
> vfio_start_irqfd_injection" in the class_init function. The
> vfio_start_irqfd_injection function can just exit if it finds
> "!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_irqfds_enabled() || !kvm_resamplefds_enabled()
> || !vdev->irqfd_allowed".
OK thanks for the guidance. Alex, are you OK with that solution. It
avoids touching the other patch
Thanks
Eric
>
> Paolo
>
