On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Michael, > > here's the virtio-ccw patches that Gerd had dropped due to conflicts > during his virtio-1 rebase. Patch 2 has been updated with my changes > to ensure big endian accesses (which was a separate patch before). > > There might be more patches that were in my tree but are not yet upstream, > but I'm still digging myself out from under the post-vacation email pile. > > I think these can still go into 2.4. Would you take them through your tree, > or should I take them through the s390x tree?
s390x makes more sense. For the series: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Cornelia Huck (2): > s390x/virtio-ccw: support virtio-1 set_vq format > s390x/virtio-ccw: enable virtio 1.0 > > Thomas Huth (2): > s390x/css: Add a callback for when subchannel gets disabled > s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call > > hw/s390x/css.c | 12 +++ > hw/s390x/css.h | 1 + > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 212 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 8 ++ > 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.3.8
