On 23/06/2015 11:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote: >> >> The current implementation is potentially more flexible but makes the >> MSR handling a little more awkward since the host_initiated bool needs >> to be passed around (patch 09). I guess either approach seems ok to >> me. >> >> Also, if this patchset is used then it looks like >> HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS can be removed. > > Paolo, > > do you have any opinion on this? I prefer > configurable way but there is no problem > to enable it by default dropping 'hv_panic' > property.
I also prefer the configurable way. Would hv_panic prevent reboot-on-BSOD from rebooting the VM? Paolo
