From: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com>
Potentially overflowing expression "1 << prop->bitnr" with
type "int" (32 bits, signed) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
and then used in a context that expects an expression of type
"uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned).
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com>
---
hw/core/qdev-properties.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
index a1606de..f78b335 100644
--- a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
+++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ PropertyInfo qdev_prop_bit = {
static uint64_t qdev_get_prop_mask64(Property *prop)
{
assert(prop->info == &qdev_prop_bit);
- return 0x1 << prop->bitnr;
+ return 0x1ull << prop->bitnr;
}
static void bit64_prop_set(DeviceState *dev, Property *props, bool val)
--
1.7.12.4
