On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 26/06/2014 16:15, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> >> (There is code for handling CPSR_E in the kernel's start_thread() >> macro but that is actually only called for starting new >> processes, AFAICT.) > > > Yes, you're right. >
So I am struggling on figuring out the need to have this extra state of signal_cpsr_e. Is it still needed and to follow up, would something similar be needed for SCTLR.E0E on AA64 support? Regards, Peter > Paolo >
