On 19/06/15 20:30, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:57 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
From: Olga Krishtal <okrish...@virtuozzo.com>

The command creates FIFO pair that can be used with existing file
read/write interfaces to communicate with processes spawned via the
forthcoming guest-file-exec interface.

Signed-off-by: Olga Krishtal <okrish...@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Roman Kagan <rka...@virtuozzo.com>
CC: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
CC: Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  qga/commands-posix.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  qga/commands-win32.c |  8 ++++-
  qga/qapi-schema.json | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Just an interface review at this point:

+++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json
@@ -215,12 +215,56 @@
    'returns': 'int' }
##
+# @GuestPipeMode
+#
+# An enumeration of pipe modes
+# read: pipe is opened for writing data
+# write: pipe is opened for reading data
+#
+# Since: 2.4
+##
+{ 'enum': 'GuestPipeMode',
+  'data': [ 'read', 'write' ] }
+
+##
+# @GuestPipeInfo
+#
+# Information about pipe.
+#
+# Since: 2.4
+##
+{ 'struct': 'GuestPipeInfo',
+  'data': {'fd': 'int'} }
Missing a field of type GuestPipeMode?
yep, nice catch :)

+
+##
+# @guest-pipe-open
+#
+# Open a pipe to in the guest to associated with a qga-spawned processes
+# for communication.
Reads poorly.  Maybe:

Open a pipe in the guest for association with later qga-spawned processes.
ok

+#
+# Returns: Guest file handle on success, as per guest-file-open. This
+# handle is usable with the same interfaces as a handle returned by
+# guest-file-open.
+#
+# Since: 2.4
+##
+{ 'command': 'guest-pipe-open',
+  'data':    { 'mode': 'GuestPipeMode' },
+  'returns': ['GuestPipeInfo'] }
I'm assuming the array will always contain two elements?  Would it be
any simpler to return a single dictionary of { 'read': 'int', 'write':
'int' } for naming the two fds directly, instead of having to parse
through [ { 'fd': 1 }, { 'fd': 2 } ] ?

this looks much better to me

+
+##
+##
  # @guest-file-close:
  #
  # Close an open file in the guest
  #
  # @handle: filehandle returned by guest-file-open
  #
+# Please note that closing the write side of a pipe will block until the read
+# side is closed.  If you passed the read-side of the pipe to a qga-spawned
+# process, make sure the process has exited before attempting to close the
+# write side.
+#
  # Returns: Nothing on success.
  #
  # Since: 0.15.0



Reply via email to