On 18 June 2015 at 21:57, Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18.06.2015 23:46, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 17 June 2015 at 16:25, Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> cp_reg_reset() is called from g_hash_table_foreach() which does not >>> define a specific ordering of the hash table iteration. Thus doing reset >>> for registers marked as ALIAS would give an ambiguous result when >>> resetvalue is different for original and alias resisters. >> Was this actually the case for any of our registers? ie, is this >> patch fixing a bug, or just cleaning up a potential cause of >> confusion? > > Peter, I discovered such a confusing behavior for PMCR register and > decided to sort this out.
Ah yes, nice catch. I'll fix up the commit message. -- PMM
