Hi Gonglei,
On 06/11/2015 09:55 AM, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2015/6/11 15:14, Eric Auger wrote:
>> g_malloc0_n() is introduced since glib-2.24 while QEMU currently
>> requires glib-2.22. This may cause a link error on some distributions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/platform.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/platform.c b/hw/vfio/platform.c
>> index 35266a8..c0acc8b 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/platform.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/platform.c
>> @@ -346,8 +346,7 @@ static int vfio_populate_device(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - vdev->regions = g_malloc0_n(vbasedev->num_regions,
>> - sizeof(VFIORegion *));
>> + vdev->regions = g_malloc0(vbasedev->num_regions * sizeof(VFIORegion *));
>>
>
> Why not use g_new0() which returned pointer is cast to the given type?
Looks relevant indeed.
g_malloc0 is used in similar situations in rest of the VFIO code so I
posted a new version and let Alex choose among both.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Regards,
> -Gonglei
>> for (i = 0; i < vbasedev->num_regions; i++) {
>> struct vfio_region_info reg_info = { .argsz = sizeof(reg_info) };
>>
>
>
