On 08/06/2015 13:19, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> I would simply sort everything (and do it for new machine types only, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> for backward compatibility reasons). Sorting user-provided blobs only >>> adds complexity for no reason. > >> Do we want this for all machine types, or only for new ones?
I think it is not backwards compatible: sorting names changes the fw_cfg ids of the files, and hence the guest ABI. Paolo
