On 6 June 2015 at 01:49, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Ok that's all I found. So otherwise, > > Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com>
Thanks! > I assume this is intended to break backwards compat on the VMSD with > the conversion from put_byte loop to VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY? I'm not > sure what our policy is on these old ARM machines and preserving the > backwards compat. We don't currently care about back-compat on migration state for any ARM boards (and definitely not for these ancient devboard models). -- PMM
