These days modification of the TLB is done in notdirty_mem_write,
so the virtual address and env pointer as unnecessary.
The new name of the function, tlb_unprotect_code, is consistent with
tlb_protect_code.
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
cputlb.c | 3 +--
include/exec/cputlb.h | 3 +--
translate-all.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cputlb.c b/cputlb.c
index 7606548..dd1203b 100644
--- a/cputlb.c
+++ b/cputlb.c
@@ -131,8 +131,7 @@ void tlb_protect_code(ram_addr_t ram_addr)
/* update the TLB so that writes in physical page 'phys_addr' are no longer
tested for self modifying code */
-void tlb_unprotect_code_phys(CPUState *cpu, ram_addr_t ram_addr,
- target_ulong vaddr)
+void tlb_unprotect_code(ram_addr_t ram_addr)
{
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_flag(ram_addr, DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE);
}
diff --git a/include/exec/cputlb.h b/include/exec/cputlb.h
index e0da9d7..360815e 100644
--- a/include/exec/cputlb.h
+++ b/include/exec/cputlb.h
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@
#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
/* cputlb.c */
void tlb_protect_code(ram_addr_t ram_addr);
-void tlb_unprotect_code_phys(CPUState *cpu, ram_addr_t ram_addr,
- target_ulong vaddr);
+void tlb_unprotect_code(ram_addr_t ram_addr);
void tlb_reset_dirty_range(CPUTLBEntry *tlb_entry, uintptr_t start,
uintptr_t length);
void cpu_tlb_reset_dirty_all(ram_addr_t start1, ram_addr_t length);
diff --git a/translate-all.c b/translate-all.c
index d118c6c..0e2ad8a 100644
--- a/translate-all.c
+++ b/translate-all.c
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ void tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(tb_page_addr_t start,
tb_page_addr_t end,
if (!p->first_tb) {
invalidate_page_bitmap(p);
if (is_cpu_write_access) {
- tlb_unprotect_code_phys(cpu, start, cpu->mem_io_vaddr);
+ tlb_unprotect_code(start);
}
}
#endif
--
2.4.1
