On 05/22/2015 04:32 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 22 May 2015 at 11:22, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 22 May 2015 at 11:00, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 21 May 2015 at 18:39, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 32ad48abd74a997220b841e4e913edeb267aa362: >>>> >>>> target-alpha: Add vector implementation for CMPBGE (2015-05-21 10:34:18 >>>> -0700) >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >> >> Except I failed to notice a test failure from one of my builds >> before pushing: >> >> target-alpha/int_helper.c: In function 'helper_cmpbge': >> target-alpha/int_helper.c:77: error: invalid operands to binary >= >> target-alpha/int_helper.c:79: error: subscripted value is neither >> array nor pointer >> >> That's in the Centos5 build, which is >> gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-55) >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> I do note that this build target is basically obsolete anyway, because >> we're about to move to requiring glib 2.22, at which point Centos5 is >> officially Too Old. So maybe we just say "yeah, you need a newer gcc" ? > > Hmm. This fails on some of the travis builds too, with slightly > different warnings: > > gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 > target-alpha/int_helper.c:77:24: error: invalid operands to binary >= > (have '__vector(16) unsigned char' and '__vector(16) unsigned char') > > I think the best thing to do for the moment is to revert commit > 32ad48abd74a9 so we can get trunk building again, so I'm going to > do that.
Wow, I would have thought 4.6 would have been new enough. Sorry for the headache. Yes, a revert is probably best until I can figure out what versions do what. r~
