On (Fri) 08 May 2015 [10:31:56], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:40:50PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) 07 May 2015 [13:45:26], Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On 7 May 2015 at 12:50, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi again
> > > >
> > > > For v2
> > > >
> > > > - fix 32bit compilation (as said, compiling for 64bit linux, 64bit
> > > > windows and 32bit windows was not enough)
> > > >
> > > > - Now, we have versions 2.4 everywhere (thanks Eric)
> > > >
> > > > - Liang Li sent a new patch to the list to fix the update of a
> > > > migration parameter, included.
> > > >
> > > > Please apply, and sorry for the inconvenience.
> > >
> > > Fails to build on win32:
> >
> > Does the buildbot try all these combinations? I want to have a
> > 'stage' branch where I just push unapplied patches and receive
> > complaints before sending a pull req.
>
> The buildbot is dead and requires maintenance:
> http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/one_line_per_build
>
> There are two alternatives:
>
> 1. Travis (see .travis.yml) but it's missing mingw32. It will never be
> able to do builds for host operating systems that do not support
> cross-compilation from Linux.
>
> 2. patchew (http://qemu.patchew.org/) but it only has Fedora 20 x86_64
> builds at the moment. Adding mingw32 cross-compilation should be
> possible but it scans the mailing list rather than git repos.
>
> The source code to patchew is available here:
> https://github.com/famz/patchew
>
> The trouble with continuous integration and build farms is that they
> require maintenance. I think patchew is the best bet right now since
> Fam is developing it.
Yes, thanks a lot!
I'm wondering how Peter does his builds, and if he can share his
recipes or build farms for maintainer trees (or just some -staging
tree like the kernel).
Amit
